| 胡 绪 明.马克思三大社会形态理论及其现实意义[J].南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版）,2006,(3):40~45 |
| 马克思三大社会形态理论及其现实意义 |
| On Marx's Theory of Three Social Configurationsand Its Realistic Significance |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 马克思 劳动时间 社会形态 剩余劳动时间 必要劳动时间 自由时间 |
| 英文关键词:Marx labor hour social configuration surplus labor hour essential labor hour free hour |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 通过对马克思三大社会形态理论生成的历史过程的梳理，论述马克思三大社会形态的本质差别在于对劳动时间的关心程度不同。按照马克思的三大社会形态理论，处于现代化运动过程中的中国已经越出第一大社会形态，正积极借鉴吸收第二大社会形态的有益成果，为向第三大社会形态发展创造现实条件，这就决定了中国现代化运动的目标就是实现现实的个人对劳动时间的关注，以及通过占有自由劳动时间而达到个人的全面自由发展。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| By reviewing the historical creation of Marx's theory of three social configurations, this research claims that the essential difference between the three social configurations lies in the extent to which the concern is paid to labor hour. According to Marx's theory of three social configurations, Chinese modernization movement has now surpassed the first social configuration, and is adopting beneficial achievements of the second configuration to lay practical foundation for the transition to the third social configuration. Therefore, the ultimate target for the Chinese modernization movement is, for the social individuals, to achieve the concern on the labor hour and to achieve all-round and free development through the possession of free labor hours. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |