岳书敬,胡姚雨,邹玉琳.跨市域地区综合创新效率分析
——以苏南自主创新示范区为例[J].南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2015,(04):33~39 |
跨市域地区综合创新效率分析
——以苏南自主创新示范区为例 |
Analysis of the comprehensive innovation efficiency in trans municipal areas:A case study of Southern Jiangsu Independent Innovation Demonstration Area |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 创新效率 自主创新 协同创新 环境创新 |
英文关键词:innovation efficiency independent innovation operative innovation environment innovation |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年项目“基于绿色生产函数理论的区域绿色发展评价及政策设计研究”(71303042);江苏省社会科学基金重点项目“苏南自主创新示范区建设的内涵、评估与对策研究”(12DDA005 |
|
摘要点击次数: |
全文下载次数: |
中文摘要: |
作为首个跨市域的创新示范区,苏南自主创新示范区的建设有着极其重要的示范作用。在绿色经济背景下,覆盖多城市的苏南自主创新示范区的目标是自主创新、协同创新、环境创新的综合性提升。以苏南五市为研究对象,辅以其他城市为参考,从自主创新、协同创新、环境创新三个方面,构建跨市域自主创新示范区的综合创新效率评价模型,运用SBM方向性距离函数评价其综合创新效率。结果显示:苏南五市中南京综合创新效率最优;苏州、无锡两市协同创新效率较低;常州、镇江两市投入效率较高;苏南五市的环境创新效率都有较大提升空间。提升协同创新和环境创新,将是促进苏南自主创新示范区综合创新效率趋同的重要实现途径。 |
英文摘要: |
Southern Jiangsu Independent Innovation Demonstration Area, as the first trans municipal one, plays insightful model roles. In the context of green economy, the Demonstration Area that integrates five cities aims at the comprehensive upgrading of independent innovation, cooperative innovation and environment innovation. This paper takes the five cities as an example and creates a comprehensive innovation efficiency evaluation model, using SBM evaluation method to calculate the innovation efficiency based on the former three aspects. We find that Nanjing has the best innovation efficiency, Suzhou and Wuxi are lower in cooperative innovation efficiency, while Changzhou and Zhenjiang are higher in input efficiency, besides that all the five cities environment innovation efficiency are all expected to be improved. To upgrade the cooperative innovation and environment innovation will be an important approach to the improvement of the comprehensive innovation efficiency of the Southern Jiangsu Independent Innovation Demonstration Area |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |