| 邓文华.如何看待“重写文学史”的成就与问题——以朱栋霖等主编的《中国现代文学史1917—2000》为例[J].南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版）,2015,(04):71~78 |
| 如何看待“重写文学史”的成就与问题——以朱栋霖等主编的《中国现代文学史1917—2000》为例 |
| How to treat the achievements and problems of rewriting literary history: A case study of Modern Chinese Literature History (1917—2000) edited by Zhu Donglin |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 文学史论 朱栋霖 中国现代文学史 |
| 英文关键词:the history of literature Zhu Donglin modern Chinese literature history |
| 基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“‘样板戏’研究的研究：1967—2011”（12YJC760013）；广东省教育厅育苗工程项目“‘人民文学’视阈与新中国文学制度构想”（2013WYM_0086）；广东省哲学社会科学项目“‘人民文学’视阈和文学制度的建构”（GD13XZW14）；五邑大学青年科研基金项目“梁启超的文体观与其国家形象建构关系研究”（2013sk04） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 朱栋霖等主编的《中国现代文学史1917—2000》是自“重写文学史”理念提出以来比较有代表性的一部文学史。与同类著述相比，其成就主要有三：一是概括性较强、条理性较好，有利于初学者接受；二是吸收了学界最新研究成果或做法；三是世界文学视野与比较文学方法的应用。同时它也存在四个问题：一是“人的文学”理念泛化；二是现代性与现代化概念含混；三是台港文学如何“入史”的问题；四是史料与史实等问题。上述问题的出现，除了与文学史写作本身的艰难、“重写文学史”实践不够等有关外，还与“集体编撰”的方式有关。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The Modern Chinese Literature History (1917—2000) edited by Zhu Donglin and et al is more representative since rewriting literature history was proposed. Compared with other similar works, the achievements or characteristics of this literature history mainly are of three aspects: being more generalized and better organized so it is more accepted by beginners; the absorbing of the latest research results and practice of the academia; and the application of the vision of world literature and comparative literature approach. At the same time, it also has four problems: too generalized concept of “Peoples Literature”; the vague distinction of modernity and modernization; the problem concerning how the literature of Taiwan and Hong Kong enters the history; and the historical data and materials problem. In addition to the difficulties in the compiling of such literary histories and inadequate practices, these problems could also be due to the collective compilation approach. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |