| 董少平,马丽欣.性别视角下算法权力异化的治理路径[J].南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版）,2023,(06):11~20 |
| 性别视角下算法权力异化的治理路径 |
| The governance path of alienated algorithmic power from the perspective of gender |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 算法性别歧视 权力异化 算法规制 算法治理 |
| 英文关键词:algorithmic sexism power alienation algorithm |
| 基金项目:国家社科基金重大项目“数字时代总体国家安全观的理论深化与实践逻辑研究”（22ZDA120）；中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助（202310683）；中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助（202250720） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 凭借对强大的数据资源的占有，算法技术逐渐披上了“权力的外衣”，随之而来也打破了原有的“权利”制约“权力”的平衡，出现算法权力异化问题。算法权力异化背景下，看似中立的算法技术，通过自动化决策与自动化评分等方式，将传统社会固有的性别歧视隐蔽式放大，使得劳动就业领域的法律保护机制失灵，算法权力与劳动权利的互动失衡。为此，应搭建用于劳动的自动化决策的第三方对话机制，从多领域实现对算法性别歧视规范体系的结构性扩容，确立算法治理中人的主体地位，以避免算法权力异化带来的劳动就业领域的性别歧视。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| By virtue of the possession of vast data, algorithm gradually put on the “coat of power”, and subsequently has broken the original constraints of “rights” on the “power”, leading to the alienation of algorithmic power. In this context, the seemingly neutral algorithmic technology secretly magnifies the inherent gender discrimination in the traditional society by means of automatic decision making and automatic scoring. Consequently, the legal protection mechanism in the field of labor and employment fails, and the interaction between algorithm power and labor rights becomes unbalanced. To this end, a third party dialogue mechanism for automated labor decision making should be built to achieve the structural expansion of the algorithm gender discrimination standard system in multiple sites, and establish the dominant position of people in algorithm governance. By doing so, it is expected to avoid gender discrimination in the field of labor and employment caused by the alienation of algorithm power. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |