| 张勇,李泽远.算法垄断行为的刑法规制[J].南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版）,2025,(01):50~60 |
| 算法垄断行为的刑法规制 |
| Criminal regulation of algorithmic monopoly |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 算法垄断 竞争法益 算法共谋 刑法规制 刑行衔接 数据安全 |
| 英文关键词:algorithmic monopoly competition law interests algorithm collusion criminal regulation connection between punishment and execution data security |
| 基金项目:国家社科基金项目（23BFX116） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 算法垄断行为是指利用算法排除、限制竞争及其他排他性滥用的行为，包括算法共谋和以算法为垄断工具的行为。相比传统垄断行为,算法垄断行为的覆盖面更广、稳定性与隐蔽性更强，会严重侵害竞争法益，因此,对其进行刑法规制具有必要性。在刑法中设立包括个人在内的刑事责任，具有提高实施垄断行为违法成本和增强威慑力的功能。刑法现有罪名只能对实施算法垄断行为过程中产生的危害行为进行规制，很难直接规制以算法共谋为代表的算法垄断行为。在刑法规制完善上，可以通过对既有罪名进行司法解释的方式，同时遵循刑法谦抑性原则、比例原则并注重刑行责任衔接。倘若设立垄断罪，应当涵盖算法共谋行为并确立前置行政程序规范对法条竞合予以排除，在法定刑设置上应在主刑设置自由刑，在附加刑设置罚金刑，在处罚对象上既处罚自然人也处罚单位，对单位犯罪实行双罚制。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Algorithmic monopoly refers to using algorithms to exclude, restrict competition and other exclusive abuses, including algorithmic conspiracy and the use of algorithms as a tool for monopoly. Compared with the traditional monopoly behavior, it has wider coverage, stronger stability and concealment, and will seriously infringe on the legal interests of competition. Therefore, it is necessary to regulate it under criminal law. The establishment of criminal liability in criminal law, including individuals, has the function of increasing the illegal cost of implementing monopolistic behavior and enhancing deterrence power. The existing criminal charges in the criminal law can only regulate harmful behaviors arising from the implementation of algorithmic monopoly, and it is difficult to directly evaluate algorithmic monopoly behaviors represented by algorithmic collusion. In terms of improving the regulation of criminal law, it can be achieved through judicial interpretation of existing charges, while adhering to the principles of modesty and proportionality in criminal law, and emphasizing the connection of criminal liability. If the crime of monopoly is established, it should cover algorithmic conspiracy behavior and establish pre administrative procedural norms to exclude the competition of legal provisions. The statutory punishment should be set as the main punishment against freedom, and the additional punishment should be set as a fine. Both natural persons and units should be punished, and a dual punishment system should be implemented for unit crimes. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|