首页期刊简介编委会投稿简则审稿须知期刊订阅联系我们
张星,陈堂发.网络表达追责的法治理性研究[J].南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2018,(06):14~22
网络表达追责的法治理性研究
On ruling expressions on the Internet by legal rationality
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  网络表达追责  社会危害  诽谤  社会秩序  寻衅滋事
英文关键词:accountability for network expression  social harmfulness  libel  social order  quarrel provoking
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“互联网与表达权的法律边界研究”(15ZDB144)
作者单位
张星 现代快报社 总编室江苏 南京210005 
陈堂发 南京大学 新闻传播学院江苏 南京210008 
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      网络表达追责存在法条适用形式化、刑事政策偏重倾向:一是“社会秩序”“社会危害”认定的模糊性,表现为“社会危害性”解释的主观性,缺失“危害社会秩序”是否适合诽谤罪、“社会危害性”认定是否宜于采取优势证据标准的考量;二是以“寻衅滋事”追责须强化法条的实质性解释,强调援引“寻衅滋事”适用对象的明确性及法益取舍的恰当性;三是应当严格诽谤入罪条件,即以民事责任优先政策弱化检举不实言论的诽谤罪适用。
英文摘要:
      Accountability for network expression tends to have a formalized application of legal terms and particular stress on criminal policies. Firstly, there exists fuzziness in recognizing “social order” and “social harmfulness”, which can be found in the subjectivity of explaining “social harmfulness”, the lack of whether “harmful to social order” is suitable for libel conviction, and the lack of whether “social harmfulness” can be determined based on priority evidences; Secondly, the accountability for “quarrel provoking” needs to strengthen the substantive interpretation of legal terms, emphasizing the clarity of applicable objects and the appropriateness of the legal interests. Thirdly, the incrimination conditions of libel conviction need to be strict, that is to say, the priority policy of civil liability should be stressed by weakening the application of libel in the prosecution of false remarks.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

你是第4259518访问者
版权所有
Tel: E-mail:
技术支持:本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计