首页期刊简介编委会投稿简则审稿须知期刊订阅联系我们
郑惠生.文艺学学术史书写的艰难、缺陷与根基[J].南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2020,22(4):66~74
文艺学学术史书写的艰难、缺陷与根基
Difficulties, deficiencies and foundations in writing the academic history of the theory of literature and art
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  文艺学学术史书写  文艺史书写  文艺学批评  文艺批评  文艺学共同体  文艺学建设
英文关键词:writing the academic history of the theory of literature and art  writing the history of literature and art  criticism of theory of literature and art  literary criticism  community of literary studies  construction of theory of literature and art
基金项目:
作者单位
郑惠生 汕头职业技术学院 人文社科系广东 汕头515041 
摘要点击次数: 97
全文下载次数: 21
中文摘要:
      有说服力的文艺学学术史书写路径,应该为“文艺学(研究)—文艺学批评(研究的研究)—文艺学学术史(整合梳理、深化提升)”。当前文艺学学术史书写之所以不能像文艺史书写那样让人满意,关键的原因是本该有的“完整链条”不完整,即未能借力于能够展现学术共同体集体智慧的“批评”。就大的方面而言,“文艺学批评”对于文艺学学术史书写的作用,可分别从“众人的前期准备”“自身的中间补充”和“他人的后续推进”三个主要环节来考察。
英文摘要:
      A reasonable way in writing the academic history of the theory of literature and art should start from Theory of Literature and Art (research) to Theory of Literature and Art criticism (re research), further to the academic history of the Theory of Literature and Art (to integrate, sort out, and then to deepen and promote the whole study). The key reason why writing the academic history of the theory of literature and art can't be as satisfying as writing literature and art history is that it hasn't the complete processes as it should have, that is to say, the failure to use the “criticism” that represents the collective wisdom of the academic community. In major aspect, the role of the theory of literature and art criticism in the writing of the academic history of the theory of literature and art can be analyzed from the three main links as of “the early preparation stage of people”, “the intermediate supplement of oneself” and “the follow up move forward of others”.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

你是第3068027访问者
版权所有
Tel: E-mail:
技术支持:本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计