| 詹红星,李漫惠.盗窃NFT行为性质研究——以财产与数据的区分为视角[J].南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版）,2023,(02):13~23 |
| 盗窃NFT行为性质研究——以财产与数据的区分为视角 |
| Research on the nature of NFT theft behavior——From the perspective of the distinction between property and data |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: NFT 财产犯罪 数据犯罪 数据分层 盗窃罪 |
| 英文关键词:NFT property crime data crime data layering larceny |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| NFT属虚拟财产，在侵犯虚拟财产行为规制问题上，广大学者倡导应回归财产犯罪规制路径，引入数据分层理论。在数据信息内容层，NFT是可感知的虚拟财产，而私钥则是纯粹的数据排列，由此非法获取NFT私钥的行为涉及数据犯罪，而NFT本体则是财产犯罪的对象，窃取NFT之行为盗窃罪成立。NFT盗窃分为直接针对平台的盗窃和先获取私钥后盗取NFT两种情形，前者无关私钥一般仅涉及盗窃罪；后者则手段行为和目的行为紧密联系，当前后行为都成立犯罪时是牵连犯；在尚未转移占有NFT时，则可能成立数据犯罪和盗窃罪的犯罪预备之想象竞合。对NFT盗窃既遂数额的认定也需将NFT分为有价凭证与无体物两大类型。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| NFT is virtual property, and scholars advocate returning to the path of property crime regulation and introducing the theory of data layering when it comes to regulating violations of virtual property. In the content layer of data information, NFT is a perceivable virtual property, while private keys are pure data permutations. Therefore, the act of illegally obtaining NFT private keys involves data crimes, while NFT itself is the object of property crimes, and the act of stealing NFT is established as larceny. NFT theft can be divided into two situations: theft directly targeting the platform and theft of NFT after obtaining the private key. The former has no relation to the private key and generally only involves larceny; the latter requires the means and purpose of the act is closely linked, the former and latter acts are implicated in the establishment of the crime; in the occasion of no transfer of possession of NFT, it may be established data crime and larceny of the imaginary competition of criminal preparation. The determination of the amount of attempted NFT larceny also requires dividing NFT into two types: valuable vouchers and intangible objects. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |